Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Adoption Petition of Romero

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 2006No. 25,877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRY, Judge.

{1} Petitioners have filed a motion for rehearing, which we hereby deny. We withdraw the opinion filed July 26, 2006, and substitute this opinion in its stead.

{2} In this adoption proceeding, in which the district court terminated the biological father’s parental rights, we consider under what circumstances our statutes require a biological father’s consent to an adoption. Because we conclude the father’s consent was required in this case, we also determine what must be shown to terminate parental rights under our presumptive abandonment statute. NMSA 1978, § 32A-5-15(B),…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Torres v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. HeimNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Benjamin O.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. J.S. v. P.K.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Helen G. v. Mark J.H.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Helen G. v. Mark JhNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. MontanoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API