Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Manziel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1942No. 5991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

In this suit of Bobby Manziel, alleged leaseholder, joined by others, appellees herein, against Humble Oil & Refining Company, an alleged leaseholder, appellant herein, plaintiffs alleged the statutory action in trespass to try title, with an additional plea for an interlocutory decree in the form of a mandatory injunction. Upon a hearing, the trial court granted the mandatory injunction as prayed for, which required appellant to deliver immediate possession of the parcel of land in controversy to appellees and restrained appellant from thereafter interfering with the land…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lofstad v. MuraskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Morgan v. SmartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Illinois Steel Co. v. JekaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Brand v. United States Car Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. Contest of the Alleged Election of EricksonHudson County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. ManzielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Sansing v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Agustin Maldonado, A. Maldonado Co. Inc., and Enrique T. Maldonado as Trustee of the Agustin Maldonado, Jr. Revocable Trust, (APPELLANTS) v. Empire Land Company, Ltd., and Empire Truck Lines, Inc., (APPELLEES), Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API