Legal Opinion

Quintana v. Eddins

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2001No. 21,882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} In this appeal, we consider whether a parent is underemployed for the purpose of imputing income in determining child support when the parent is working full time in his area of expertise, but is earning less than he had made previously when employed in a different state and less than he could make if he had accepted a position with a private company rather than with a state institution. In addition, we determine whether dividend and interest income earned on a self-employed pension, individual retirement account (SEP-IRA) may be treated as income in calculating…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Las Cruces Professional Fire Fighters & International Ass'n of Fire Fighters v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Dunn v. DunnAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Nelson v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Beaudoin v. BeaudoinAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grant v. CumifordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Thompson v. DehneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State ex rel. Human Services Department v. KelleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Baca v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Minteer v. SudlowNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API