Solomons v. Chesley
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
From Rockingham Circuit Court. Review. The above action is brought forward from the docket of October term, 1874, upon notice, by Chesley, of review, under the provisions of Gen. Stats., ch. 215, secs. 3, 9. The original'action was entered in the supreme judicial court against Chesley and one Alexander, at the April trial term, 1872, and was continued.
Read the full summary
From Rockingham Circuit Court. Review. The above action is brought forward from the docket of October term, 1874, upon notice, by Chesley, of review, under the provisions of Gen. Stats., ch. 215, secs. 3, 9. The original'action was entered in the supreme judicial court against Chesley and one Alexander, at the April trial term, 1872, and was continued. The defendant filed the general issue, with a brief statement, June 7, 1872. The plea was not formally joined by the plaintiffs. The action was continued from term to term until the October term of the circuit court, 1874, when it was…
1Opinion of the Court
FROM ROCKINGHAM CIRCUIT COURT. "Civil actions in the supreme court in which an issue has been joined and judgment rendered, except in cases otherwise provided, and such actions in which judgment has been rendered by agreement of parties open to review, may be once reviewed." Gen. Stats., ch. 215, sec. 1. This action answers all the requirements of the statute, unless it must be said that issue was not joined.
The defendant pleaded the general issue, which of course must have concluded to the country, and thus referred the trial to the jury. He did everything incumbent on him to do that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Whiting v. CochranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Perry v. GoodwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
- Smith v. GilmanSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1826
3Cited by1 opinion
- Messer v. SmythSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881