United States v. Hines
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ACCEPTING PLEA OF NOLO CONTENDERE
SACHS, District Judge.
The question before the Court is whether I should accept a plea of nolo contendere offered by the defendant but opposed by the United States Attorney, pursuant to a departmental policy dating back to a 1953 directive, recently restated. District Judge Tolin dealt with this situation in United States v. Jones, 119 F.Supp. 288 (S.D.Cal.1954) by declaring that notwithstanding the department's position, “the Court will ordinarily allow [a nolo plea] to be entered.” 1.c. 290. Although a guilty plea may be greatly preferred…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Tyrone GaskinsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Eddie Lee Davis, A/K/A Big DaddyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
- M.H. Bell and Bettie Lou Bell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. ChambersDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1987