Legal Opinion
Dennebaum v. Rotterdam Square, L.P.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 29, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Kramer, J.), entered November 14, 2003 in Schenectady County, which denied a motion by defendant Clifford H. Quay & Sons, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint and cross claims by defendant Rotterdam Square, L.E against it.
Plaintiff commenced this action after sustaining injuries when she tripped on the sidewalk outside the Rotterdam Square Mall in January 2001. The sidewalk was constructed by defendant Clifford H. Quay & Sons, Inc. in 1988 pursuant to a contract with defendant Rotterdam Square, L.E Asserting that Quay was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Palka v. Servicemaster Management Services Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Church v. Callanan Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by9 opinions
- Luby v. Rotterdam Square, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Wyant v. Professional Furnishing & Equipment, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- D'Amico v. Archdiocese of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- LaMoy v. MH Contractors, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Izzo v. Proto Construction & Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.