Legal Opinion

Marcella v. Brandywine Hospital

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 15, 1995No. 94-1691UnknownCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINIÓN OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

This is a negligence suit growing out of a transfusion of contaminated blood collected by the Red Cross through its volunteer donor program. After a bench trial, the district court entered judgment in favor of the Red Cross. In this appeal, we hold that the Red Cross is not clothed with governmental immunity and therefore the plaintiffs request for a jury trial should have been granted. Accordingly, the case must be remanded for a new trial. We concur with the district court’s determination that the donor of the blood may be required to testify, but…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Department of Employment v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marcella v. Brandywine HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Mazzella v. PatroneDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API