Legal Opinion

Hull v. Saul

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 31, 2019No. 3:18-cv-50162Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION MIKE H.,1 ) No. 18 CV 50162 on behalf of Mary H., ) ) Magistrate Judge Iain D. Johnston Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ANDREW SAUL,2 ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Mike H., on behalf of his wife and original claimant, Mary H.,3 brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking remand of the decision denying his wife’s social security benefits. For the reasons below, the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied, the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Elder v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Terry Steele v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Darius Scott v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Simila v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API