Legal Opinion
Rozz v. Village Auto Body Works, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 9, 2012Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover for damage to his vehicle, which was sustained on October 24, 2009. On the small claims complaint form, plaintiff alleged that his son, who was driving plaintiffs vehicle on the Seaford Oyster Bay Expressway, “collid[ed]” with a license plate which was lying in the roadway, following which his son lost control of the vehicle and hit the concrete median of the highway. He further alleged that defendant Village Auto Body Works, Inc. (Village Auto) was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Sheehan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- White v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.