Legal Opinion
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. CITY OF MITCHEL, IND.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided December 30, 1999No. NA 97-98-C B/GPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARKER, Chief Judge.
The Court hereby enters its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Summary Judgment in favor of Plaintiff, CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSXT”), whose October 6, 1999, motion for such relief has gone unopposed by the Defendant and, as a matter of fact and law, is entitled to be granted. 1
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. CSXT is a “railroad” as that term is defined in the Federal Safety Authorization Act of 1994, 49 U.S.C. § 20101, et seq.
2. Due to the configuration of CSXT’s rail operations within the municipal confines of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Csx Transportation, Inc. v. City of Plymouth, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. City of BayonneDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Reno v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992
3Cited by10 opinions
- Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- City of Seattle v. Burlington Northern RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Village of Mundelein v. Wisconsin Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- City of Seattle v. Burlington NR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.