Legal Opinion

Bannock National Bank v. Automobile Accessories Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, C. J.

— The original action was one between the Bannock National Bank and the Automobile Accessories Company, W. W. White, Ancy Sullivan, and D. D. White. The intervention was based upon the claim of Eleanor M. Sullivan that a sum of money attached in the original action as the property of Ancy Sullivan, her husband, was her separate property. The cause was tried to the court sitting without a jury and judgment was awarded against appellant, holding that the money in controversy was community property and therefore subject to the judgment entered against the husband of appellant. From this judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clifford v. LakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Wilkerson v. AvenIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Littler v. JefferisIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Bates v. PapeshIdaho Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hill v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Aker v. AkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Sullivan v. MabeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Moore v. CroftIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API