Legal Opinion
Muyubisnay Cungachi v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 25, 2013No. 19-1636PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEARNS, District Judge.
Petitioner Segundo Muyubisnay-Cunga-chi seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying a motion to reconsider his motion to reopen based on changed country circumstances. He also appeals the denial of a second motion to reopen based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because we agree with the BIA that Muyubisnay-Cun-gachi has failed to establish a statutorily protected ground of persecution or to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel, we deny his petition.
I. Facts and Background
Segundo Muyubisnay-Cungachi…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Julio Lozada v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Nikijuluw v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Bernal-Vallejo v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Baghdasaryan v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Elizabeth Lona v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Castillo-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Garcia v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Omar v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Saka v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.