Legal Opinion

Carey v. Gunnison

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 8, 1885PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Fremont District Court. This action was brought to recover for damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of a breach of a contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant, whereby the latter purchased of the former his interest in a stock of goods. There was a trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

fense-mis-le" subject-matequrtabie11 issue. I. The plaintiff, as a member of the firm of Carey & Warren, was at one time in trade as a hardware merchant in Shenandoah, Iowa. In 1877 he sold, as supposed, his interest in the stock to the defendant, Gunnison, who became a partner with Warren. The plaintiff agreed to pay of the indebtedness of Carey & Warren the sum of $10,000, and Warren & Gunnison agreed to pay the remainder. The agreement was reduced to writing. The plaintiff has paid indebtedness in excess of $10,000, and which he avers Gunnison should have paid, but failed to pay. This…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. McConnell v. Iowa Mutual Aid Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  2. Lynch v. SchemmelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Boyce v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. Burlington Lumber Co. v. Evans Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Poole v. PooleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API