Legal Opinion

San Jose Land & Water Co. v. San Jose Ranch Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1900No. L.A. No. 858PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion. Dunnigan & Dunnigan, and Anderson & Anderson, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action to quiet title to the east half of the northwest quarter of section 35, township 1 north, range 9 west, situated in Los Angeles county, and of which plaintiff claims to be the owner. Defendant denied plaintiff’s ownership and denied that defendant claims any interest in the land except “the right to maintain in San Dimas creek (which flows over said land) a dam at a point about one hundred yards northerly from the center of said section 35, and to maintain pipes connecting with the said creek at the said dam for the purpose of conducting the waters of said creek to lands…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. United States v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. Colton Marble & Lime Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Tuffree v. PolhemusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Southern Pacific Railroad v. PainterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Le Quime v. ChambersIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Mowry v. WeisenbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Wutchumna Water Co. v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Huntington v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Huntington v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API