Legal Opinion
Bolden v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 2005No. WD 64016PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge.
Allen Bolden appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief. Bolden claims that the motion court clearly erred when it found that he was not denied effective assistance of counsel at his trial. We reverse the judgment and remand to the motion court to vacate Bolden’s convictions and sentences and afford him a new trial. •
Facts and Procedural History
The facts and circumstances of this case are quite unique. This is the second time we have addressed an appeal regarding the denial of Bolden’s motion for postcon-viction relief.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Clayton v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harper v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. WilkersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Richard v. Cooper v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021