Legal Opinion
Foss v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided February 5, 2007No. 06-CV-153-P-SPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY THE PROCEEDINGS
SINGAD, Chief Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant Circuit City Stores, Inc.’s Motions to Compel Arbitration and to Stay the Proceedings (Docket # s 5 & 6). Plaintiff Andrew Foss (“Foss”) objects to Defendant’s Motion on the grounds of infancy and unconscionability of the agreement to arbitrate. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motions to Compel Arbitration and to Stay the Proceedings are DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
Circuit City Stores, Inc. (“Circuit City”) is a national retailer of name brand consumer electronics,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Thompson v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep DodgeMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Estate of Michael Lewis v. Concord General Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Kourembanas v. Intercoast Colls.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- ALONSO v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.