Legal Opinion

Tate v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Asheville

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1986No. 8628SC653PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Petitioners make several arguments. Because we agree with petitioners that the board was without jurisdiction to enter the disputed order, we address only that issue.

G.S. 160A-388(b) provides, in relevant part, that “[t]he board of adjustment shall hear and decide appeals from and review any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative official charged with the enforcement of any ordinance adopted pursuant to this Part.” The statute clearly confers on the board only appellate jurisdiction, as distinguished from original jurisdiction, to decide whether…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Incorporation of Indian Hills, Jackson Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Board of Zoning Appeals v. HeydeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. YWCA v. Bd. of Adj. SummitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. Kaufman v. City of Glen CoveNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  5. H. R. Miller Co. v. BitlerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Midgette v. PateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Garrity v. Morrisville Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API