Edwards v. Atlantic Coast Line R.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentJustice Cothran
(dissenting) : I do not agree with the reasoning and conclusions announced in the opinion of Mr. Justice Carter for the reasons which follow.
This is an action against the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company for damages on account of personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, a yard conductor employed by the Seaboard Air Line Railway Company, in a collision between a freight train operated under his control, upon which he was riding, and a switch engine of the defendant Coast Line, operated under the control of the defendant Sanford, yard conductor, at a grade crossing of the two…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Frese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of Moultrie v. Schofield's Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- McCown v. MuldrowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Jones v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- La Follett v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1902
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.