Continental Casualty Co. v. Lasalle Re Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Before the Court is the emergency motion of Plaintiff Continental Casualty Co. (“Continental”) to remand this case to state court. (R. 6.) For the following reasons, the motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Continental, an Illinois corporation having its principal place of business in Chicago, and Defendant LaSalle Re Ltd. (“La-Salle”), a Bermuda corporation having its principal place of business in Hamilton, Bermuda, were parties to several reinsurance agreements, including one known as “All Classes Excess of Loss Retrocession Agreement No. 8550-98”…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paper Express, Limited, an Illinois Corporation v. Pfankuch Maschinen Gmbh, a German CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Lear Corporation v. Johnson Electric Holdings Limited and Nevada Bond Investment Corp. IICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Ifc Credit Corporation v. Aliano Brothers General Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Huffman v. Nations Lending CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2025