LaRose v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Movant appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
Movant pled guilty to stealing in excess of $150. As part of his plea bargain, mov-ant obtained a dismissal of a pending case and the State did not oppose probation. The trial court subsequently sentenced movant to seven years’ imprisonment.
Movant claims his attorney promised him he would get probation and told him to lie at the guilty plea hearing. Movant relies on Moore v. State, 685 S.W.2d 627 (Mo.App.1985), where the court reversed a Rule 27.26 court’s dismissal of a Rule…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wade v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wedlow v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Pines v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Robinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Baykowski v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.