Legal Opinion

LaRose v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1987No. 51834PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant pled guilty to stealing in excess of $150. As part of his plea bargain, mov-ant obtained a dismissal of a pending case and the State did not oppose probation. The trial court subsequently sentenced movant to seven years’ imprisonment.

Movant claims his attorney promised him he would get probation and told him to lie at the guilty plea hearing. Movant relies on Moore v. State, 685 S.W.2d 627 (Mo.App.1985), where the court reversed a Rule 27.26 court’s dismissal of a Rule…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wade v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wedlow v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Pines v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Robinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Baykowski v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API