Legal Opinion

Weiser v. Union Pacific Railroad

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2010No. 20080124PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶1 In this direct appeal we are asked to determine the effect of a filed but unperfect-ed pre-emption claim on the conveyance of property to the Utah Central Railroad Company under a perfected right-of-way grant by Act of Congress in 1870. Under federal law, a general right-of-way grant to a railroad is effective against pre-emptions that have only attached, but not against those that are perfected. In this case, the railroad grant is superior to the individual pre-emption claim advanced by Weiser. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court finding…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. R.C.S. v. A.O.L.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Rapela v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. SIRQ, Inc. v. Layton Companies, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Holladay v. StoreyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. Geneva Rock Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API