Legal Opinion

Ebert v. Hanneman

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion by purchaser at foreclosure sale to be relieved from purchase because of defects in the title to the premises.

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

This motion is rnadé in behalf of the purchaser at a foreclosure sale, to relieve him of his purchase *224because of defects in. the title to the premises. The property consists of seven two-story and attic frame cottages, built together upon a plot of ground 126 feet front by 108 feet four inches deep, situated at the southwest comer of Bay Thirteenth street and Benson avenue in the borough of Brooklyn.

Seven objections were raised to the taking of title, but the four urged upon this motion are:(1) That taxes for the year 1909, water rates for 1909 and 1910, assessments for sewers, Hovember 24,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. . TrueNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. City of New York v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Wormser v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Ferry v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Broadbelt v. LoewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ebert v. HannemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API