Legal Opinion

Goode v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 7, 1999No. 97-2598Published

1Per curiam

Bryan Goode appeals from the judgments and sentences entered in four separate cases. We affirm his convictions but reverse and remand for resentencing because of various guideline scoresheet errors.

At sentencing, the trial court did not have the benefit of Dillard v. State, 728 So.2d 725 (Fla.1999), wherein the supreme court explained the procedures to be followed where, as here, two versions of the guidelines are involved. See also Quinn v. State, 692 So.2d 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (“[T]he trial court was required to receive two scoresheets and impose a guidelines sentence pursuant to each…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dillard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Quinn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API