United States v. Arnold L. Hollingsworth, Jr. And William A. Pickard, III
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
The defendants, Pickard (a dentist) and Hollingsworth (a farmer), were convicted by a jury of money laundering and related offenses in violation of federal law, and were sentenced to 24 and 18 months in prison, respectively. A panel of this court held that the defendants had been entrapped as a matter of law, and were entitled to be acquitted. 9 F.3d 593 (7th Cir.1993). Rehearing en banc was granted on the petition of the government, which contended that the decision had created a new element of the defense of entrapment — “readiness”—and by doing so had radically altered…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Beckwith v. City of Daytona Beach ShoresCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. SquillacoteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Dwayne A. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Abdul Majid Bala, Also Known as Sealed 2, Kantilal Patel, Also Known as Sealed 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.