Gammon v. Blaisdell
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Shawnee District Court. ACTION to recover damages for breach of contract to convey land. Judgment for the plaintiff Blaisdell, at the April term, 1888. The defendants, Gammon and another, come to this court. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hokton, C. J.:
This was an action brought in the court below by Charles H. Blaisdell against F. R. Gammon and M. E. Fowler, partners as Gammon & Fowler, for damages for an alleged breach of contract for the sale of real estate. On the 22d day of May, 1886, Gammon & Fowler received from Blaisdell $150, as part of the purchase-money for lots *2221, 2, and 3, in block 55, in North Cullison, Pratt county, and gave a receipt, a copy of which is as follows:
“Topeka, Kansas, May 22, 1886.
“Received this day from Charles H. Blaisdell one hundred and fifty dollars as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kuhn v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Smith v. LeightonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
3Cited by3 opinions
- Summers v. Midland Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Wilcox v. Wyandotte World-Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Houser v. Paducah & Illinois RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917