Legal Opinion

Hosoda v. Neville

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1912No. 3,148PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application by Harry Hosoda for habeas corpus, directed against the sheriff of Powell county. submitted a brief and argued the cause orally. submitted a brief and argued the cause orally; also argued orally.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beantlt

Application for writ of habeas corpus. On January 27 of this year Harry Hosoda, a single man, and Bertha Mahoney, a single woman, were, by complaint filed in the justice’s court of George W. Carleton, justice of the peace for Cottonwood *311township, in Powell county, charged with the crime of living together in open and notorious cohabitation in a state of fornication. Upon a trial by a jury they were found guilty. Immediately upon the return of the verdict, the defendants being present in person and by counsel, the justice pronounced sentence imposing a fine and a term of imprisonment upon both…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. O'BrienMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Oppenheimer v. ReganMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. People v. MessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. In re GrayeMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1866

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Town of White Sulphur Springs v. VoiseMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Wilson v. BrodieMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. School District No. 8 v. LensmanMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Town of White Sulphur Springs v. VoiseMontana Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API