Legal Opinion

Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. DiBona (In Re DiBona)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 1980No. 19-10908PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:

The issue common to each of the foregoing cases and raised by us sua sponte, is whether the trustee in a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 case is a necessary party defendant to a complaint for relief from the automatic stay. We conclude that the trustee is such a necessary party and that we are required to join him as such at whatever stage the proceedings are in when we become aware that he has not been so joined.

The facts are as follows: 1 In each of the captioned adversary proceedings, a complaint for relief from the automatic stay was brought by a secured…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bellini Imports, Ltd. v. The Mason and Dixon Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  2. Administrator of Veterans' Affairs v. Sparkman (In Re Sparkman)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Boulevard Mortgage Co. v. Hinkle (In Re Hinkle)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. United Mutual Savings Bank v. Doud (In Re Doud)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1983
  5. In Re Transleisure Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API