Legal Opinion

Manufacturing Co. v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 12, 1901PublishedCited by 14 opinions

ActioN by tbe Gay Manufacturing Company against ■J. A. Hobbs and others, beard by Judge Ti-iomas McNeill •and a jury, at Eall Term, 1900, of ChowaN County Superior 'Court. Erom judgment for defendant, tbe plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomeRY, J.

It was admitted on tbe trial below that tbe logs belonged to tbe plaintiff, and that tbe plaintiff would be entitled to recover them if the contract, which was in writing, was sufficient and valid in law to convey them. The -contract was entered into on tbe 26th of April, 1887, between Noah Hollowell and bis -wife and tbe plaintiff, and it was set. forth therein that for tbe consideration of two hundred dollars, one-half to be paid on tbe execution and delivery and tbe 'Other half to be paid in twelve months, Hollowell and wife bad sold and conveyed to tbe plaintiff “all tbe timber down to 14…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thornton v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Moring v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1858

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bunch v. Elizabeth City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Carolina Helicopter Corp. v. Cutter Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Hawkins v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Liston v. Chapman & Dewey Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  5. Rumbo v. Gay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API