Claro Milling Co. v. Davis Bros.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County
Motion for judgment n. o. v. C. P. Luzerne Co., Jan. T., 1919, No. 294.
1Opinion of the CourtStrauss, J.
On March 20, 1918, the plaintiff, whose place of business was at Minneapolis, through an agent, attempted to sell to the defendants, in the City of Wilkes-Barre, a carload of barley flour (450 barrels), at $13.50 per barrel.
A written form of contract was submitted to the defendant by the agent, which contained the clause: “When confirmed by the home office, this order becomes a contract.”
*49The defendants signed the paper and the agent at once communicated by-telegraph to the home office the fact that this proposition had been signed by defendants.
On the next morning, March 21st, by telegram to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoffman v. Bloomsburg & Sullivan R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Cosgrove v. WoodwardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Huber Manufacturing Co. v. SmithgallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- New Prague Flouring Mill Co. v. KirschnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Emerson v. GraffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.