Legal Opinion

Key v. Hickman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Coke County Court; G. S. Arnold, Judge. Action by W. E. Key against Frank Hickman. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

Appellant brought this suit, seeking to recover from the appellee a balance of $400, together with interest and attorney’s fees, alleged to be owing and due upon a promissory note, executed by the defendant and payable to the order of W. F. Key and J. B. Reilley, and owned by the plaintiff, W. F. Key.

The defendant’s answer included a general demurrer, general denial, and a special plea, averring; First. That the note was without consideration. Second. That it was procured by fraud and false representations, and upon a promise that it was not to be collectible and payable until the plaintiff…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chalk v. DaggettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Helmke v. PrasifkaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Cameron v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Chalk v. DaggettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Mullins v. Auto Securities Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API