Legal Opinion
Vision Air Flight Service, Inc. v. M/V National Pride
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 22, 1998No. 97-16839PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSKOWITZ, District Judge:
Appellant Vision Air Flight Service, Inc. (“Vision Air” or “Vision”) appeals the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Appellees Madrigal-Wan Hai Lines Corp. and M/V National Pride (collectively, “Madrigal”) limiting Madrigal’s liability to $1000 for the destruction of two airport refueling trucks (“the refuelers”) that Madrigal contracted to ship and allegedly destroyed. Because the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to Appellant, creates a triable issue as to whether one of the refuelers was destroyed intentionally, we vacate the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Henley v. Marine TransportionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- St. Johns N. F. Shipping Corp. v. . S. A. Companhia Geral Commercial Do Rio De JaneiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Gamma-10 Plastics, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. American President Lines, Ltd. American President Companies, Ltd., AndCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Constable v. National Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wallis v. Princess Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Vision Air Flight Service, Inc. v. M/V National PrideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Nippon Fire & Marine Insurance v. Skyway Freight Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999