Legal Opinion
Bowling v. Stamford Anesthesiology Services, P.C.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 24, 2020No. 3:17-cv-00642Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT -------------------------------- x THERESA BOWLING, M.D., : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil No. 3:17-cv-642(AWT) : STAMFORD ANESTHESIOLOGY : SERVICES, P.C., : : Defendant. : -------------------------------- x ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 207) is hereby DENIED. Summary judgment is appropriate only when there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In ruling on a summary judgment motion, the district court must “resolve all…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Richard Kessler v. Westchester County Department of Social Services and Westchester County, Docket No. 05-2582-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Kathleen M. Cifra v. General Electric Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation, as Its SuccessorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- McMillan v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.