Legal Opinion

Holshouser v. Denver Gas & Electric Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1903No. 2249PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to-the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, P. J.

The plaintiff in error was plaintiff, and the defendant in error defendant, below. A demurrer to-the complaint for-want of facts was sustained. The-*432plaintiff elected to abide by his pleading, and judgment was entered against him.

The complaint alleged that the defendant employed the plaintiff as a stoker in its gas works; that prior to his employment the defendant became involved in trouble with the men then working for it, the result of which was a strike by those men, all of them quitting work; that the strikers were very aggressive and threatened violence to any person or persons taking…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Peninsular Car WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Fox v. Peninsular White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Perry v. MarshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. McGowan v. La Plata Mining & Smelting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1882
  5. Strahlendorf v. RosenthalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sitarek v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. McCalman v. Illinois Cent. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  3. Mitchell v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Sitarek v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API