Holshouser v. Denver Gas & Electric Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Error to-the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtThomson, P. J.
The plaintiff in error was plaintiff, and the defendant in error defendant, below. A demurrer to-the complaint for-want of facts was sustained. The-*432plaintiff elected to abide by his pleading, and judgment was entered against him.
The complaint alleged that the defendant employed the plaintiff as a stoker in its gas works; that prior to his employment the defendant became involved in trouble with the men then working for it, the result of which was a strike by those men, all of them quitting work; that the strikers were very aggressive and threatened violence to any person or persons taking…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. Peninsular Car WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Fox v. Peninsular White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Perry v. MarshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- McGowan v. La Plata Mining & Smelting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1882
- Strahlendorf v. RosenthalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sitarek v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- McCalman v. Illinois Cent. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Mitchell v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Sitarek v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 1949