Legal Opinion

Nocita v. Guiliano

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1936No. 29479PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

Frank Nocita, plaintiff, claimed that at the special instance and request of Antonio Guiliano and Rosa Guiliano, defendants, he lent to them for necessaries of life $35 on February 24, 1928, and $205 on March 20, 1928; that, in spite of many demands for repayment, no part of the loans has been repaid by them except $40 on July 14, 1931, and $100 on August 31, 1932. In the petition there was a prayer for judgment for the balance of the loans with legal interest.

In a joint answer by defendants, Antonio Guiliano denied he borrowed any money from plaintiff or paid him anything after March 20,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hayden v. FredericksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Levy v. CunninghamNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harsche v. CzyzNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Gary's Implement, Inc. v. Bridgeport Tractor Parts, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Ring v. DueyNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Gary's Implement, Inc. v. Bridgeport Tractor Parts, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API