Legal Opinion

United States v. Journey

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1936No. 1346PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Journey brought this action to recover on a term policy of War Risk Insurance. Trial by jury was waived by a written stipulation.

At the close of the evidence, counsel for the United States moved for judgment, first, on the ground that there was no disagreement, and second, there was no substantial evidence establishing that Journey was totally and permanently disabled on or before September 1, 1919, and that his policy lapsed on that date for non-payment of premiums.

The trial court overruled the motion and entered judgment for Journey.

In McLaughlin v. United States…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. EarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  3. McLaughlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. Chavez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  5. Kemp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leyerly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. United States v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  3. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API