Legal Opinion
Tate v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided March 11, 1999No. 03-97-00240-CRPublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
On original submission, this Court affirmed appellant Christopher Michael Tate’s conviction for murder. Tate v. State, 956 S.W.2d 845 (Tex.App.—Austin 1997); see Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 19.02(b)(2) (West 1994). The court of criminal appeals reversed our judgment after concluding that certain defensive evidence was erroneously excluded by the district court and that this Court erred by holding otherwise. Tate v. State, 981 S.W.2d 189 (Tex.Crim.App.1998). The appeal was remanded to us to conduct a harm analysis. Id. at 193. We will again affirm.
Background
Tate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Potier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Perez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Moore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Alford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.