Legal Opinion
Goetz v. Warden Hudson
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided May 21, 2024No. 8:23-cv-00403Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PHIL GOETZ, Petitioner, 8:23CV403 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WARDEN HUDSON, Respondent. This matter is before the Court on initial review of Petitioner Phil Goetz’s (“Goetz”) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Filing No. 1. The Court conducts this initial review of the petition pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2243
and Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts which allows the Court to apply Rule 4 of those rules to a section 2241 action. “If it plainly appears from the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Jessie Lee JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Robert HutchingsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Nichols v. SymmesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Morales v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005