Legal Opinion
Perez v. Rhea
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 25, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Where petitioner, a model tenant, has faithfully abided by an agreement with NYCHA to make full restitution of her rent underpayments, the decision to terminate her tenancy constituted a disproportionate penalty that would likely leave petitioner, the single mother of three children who also reside in the apartment, two of whom have diagnosed disabilities, homeless.
Petitioner Jacqueline Perez, 37 years of age, has lived in NYCHA housing for virtually her entire life and in the subject apartment for more than 17 years.
*477Petitioner alleged that in 2006, NYCHA sent a fax to petitioner’s employer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Featherstone v. FrancoNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Davis v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Smith v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Gray v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Holiday v. FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Perez v. RheaNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Grant v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Grant v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Kamel v. WambuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Kamel v. WambuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014