Schult v. Schult

From the trial judgment reducing his child support to $2200 per month, effective September 1, 2001, Thomas Dolan Schult, M. D., appealed, alleging these errors:

• finding that his income for purposes of the calculation of child support exceeded the guidelines’ figure set forth in La. R.S. 9:315.19;

• setting prospective support at $2,200, which he feels was too high;

• fixing the effective date of the child support reduction at September 1, 2001, instead of the date of judicial demand, a difference of several months; and

• taxing of all court costs against Dr. Schult.

Mrs. Schult answered the…