Boyko v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellant was injured while riding a bus operated by appellee, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (Metro). After a jury returned a verdict for appellant, the trial court granted appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Because we conclude that appellant presented evidence sufficient to allow a reasonable trier of fact to find in her favor, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand this case with directions to reinstate the jury’s verdict and to enter judgment upon it in favor of appellant.
Late one evening in October 1976, during…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- District of Columbia v. GandyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- District of Columbia v. GandyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Wiggins v. Capital Transit CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Fells v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robinson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Pazmino v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Robinson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Robinson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. BellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.