Legal Opinion

Maurer v. Boggs

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 31, 1938No. 14,276PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

A mandamus action to require the city council of Sterling to issue to plaintiff in error a license to retail a legislatively defined nonintoxicating beverage commonly known as 3.2 per cent beer, at a designated location in that city, which the council had refused. Whether the council’s refusal was arbitrary or without good cause, which section 6, chapter 82, Session Laws 1935 (’35 C. S. A., chapter 89, §6), inhibits, had negative resolution below. The judgment is challenged on error.

It appears that plaintiff is a citizen of the United States, a resident of Colorado, of good moral character…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van DeVegt v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  2. State ex rel. Makris v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. City of Central v. SearsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
  4. People v. StanleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  5. Meyer v. City of DecaturAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Buddy & Lloyd's Store No. 1, Inc. v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Geer v. PrestoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  3. Le Pore v. LarkinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. City of Colorado Springs v. GrahamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. SkaffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API