Legal Opinion

People v. Nunn

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 1968No. Crim. 13661PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoss, J.

By information defendant was charged with possessing marijuana in violation of Health and Safety Code, section 11530. His motion to set aside the information was granted on the ground that the marijuana was found on defendant’s person as the result of an illegal search and seizure.

Where evidence before the committing magistrate on the issue of the legality of a search and seizure is susceptible of conflicting inferences or consists only of the testimony of prosecution witnesses, the information should not be set aside on the ground that essential evidence was illegally obtained, if, resolving…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Paul Taglavore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Palmore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. People v. MercurioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API