Legal Opinion
Coeur D'alene Tribe Of Idaho v. State Of Idaho
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1994No. 92-36703PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
42 F.3d 1244
COEUR D'ALENE TRIBE OF IDAHO, in its own right and as the
beneficially interested party subject to the trusteeship of
the United States of America; Ernest L. Stensgar; Lawrence
Aripa; Margaret Jose; Domnick Curley; Al Garrick; Norma
Peone; Henry Sijohn, individually, in their official
capacity and on behalf of all enrolled members of the Coeur
D'Alene Tribe of Idaho, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
STATE OF IDAHO; Cecil D. Andrus, Governor; Pete Cenarrusa,
Secretary of State; Larry Echohawk, Attorney General; J.D.
Williams, Auditor; Jerry Evans, Superintendent of Public
Instruction; Keith…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Canadian St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- Holmes v. California Army National GuardDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
- Ashker v. California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2846, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5045 Todd Lewis Ashker v. California Department of Corrections, and Steve Brodeur Alex Astorga, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation v. UreDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025