Legal Opinion

SignalQuest v. Chou, et al.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided February 4, 2015No. CV-11-392-JLPublished

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SignalQuest, Inc. v. Civil No. 11-cv-392-JL Opinion No.

2015 DNH 020

Ten-Ming Chou, OncQue Corporation, and Bravotronics Corporation MEMORANDUM ORDER This is a dispute over the construction of the claims of a patent for a vibration switch, United States Patent No. 6,706,979 (filed Mar. 16, 2014). The plaintiff, SignalQuest, Inc., commenced this action by way of a complaint for a declaratory judgment that its products do not infringe the ‘979 patent, owned (at that point) by defendant Ten-Ming Chou. Chou, who is also the patent’s named…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API