Legal Opinion

Ex Parte State Dept. of Revenue

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 6, 1991No. 1901108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the petition for writ of certiorari in this case to determine whether Act No. 88-542, Ala. Acts 1988 (codified at Ala. Code 1975, § 6-5-605), violates Art. 4, § 45, Constitution of Alabama. The codification of that provision reads as follows:

"§ 6-5-605. Application of terms 'utilities' and 'public utility.'
"For purposes of this article and for purposes of sections 40-8-1, 40-21-50, and 40-21-58, as amended, the terms 'utilities' and 'public utility,' as applied to telecommunications, 'telephone company,' and 'telephone business' mean the provisioning of local exchange services."

In…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. ALA. DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Telamarketing Communications of MontgomeryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Smith v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Ex Parte State Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. State Department of Revenue v. Telnet Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API