Legal Opinion
Acoustic Chemical Corp. v. Gottlob
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The defendants, separately, move for dismissal of the complaint for legal insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4); The complaint is short, and it will be worthwhile to record its relevant substance at the outset: Plaintiff “ employed defendants as its agents to procure for it certain publicity on television .station "WOR-TV for a period of 13 weeks commencing with the week of July 6, 1959, and defendants accepted the said employment and promised and *439agreed to procure said publicity for -said period of time Plaintiff ‘ ‘ has performed all the terms and conditions of said employment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Grossman v. . SchenkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Lurie v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Di Mino v. Old Town Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1956
- Lupo v. Columbia Manicure Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blatt v. KronischNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Rozay v. Hegeman Steel Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962