Ritter v. Schaaf

Plaintiff in error’s contention is that the bills for services referred to in the first and third causes of action were rendered and were not disputed within a reasonable time thereafter and that, an implied contract arose between the parties for the payment of the amount named in the bills rendered and that the defendant, Paul E. Schaaf, president of The Henkel-Clauss Company, agreed with plaintiff to confess judgment for the full amount claimed and interest.

The law seems to be well established that where an account is rendered by one person to another and is riot objected to by the latter…