Legal Opinion

Eisemann v. Lapp

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1902Published

Action for partition.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

This is an action in partition tried before me without a jury.

Catherine E. Victory, who died in 1877, devised the premises involved to her four children. One of these died in 1887, intestate, unmarried and leaving him surviving as his heirs-at-law, a brother, two sisters and his father. The father thus took a life interest in the deceased’s one-fourth of the premises. Thereafter the three surviving children executed four successive mortgages on the property, accompanied in each instance by an affidavit of title *15by one of them. The father was not a party to the mortgage, having left the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. Jackson ex dem. HillsCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  2. Crary v. . GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Sands v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Stevens v. . HauserNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. Arents v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API