Estes v. State

Appeal from Rusk. The appellant was convicted upon an indictment in which the charge was that he “did bet money at a certain gaming’ table, at “rondo, which said gaming- table was then and there kept by one Andrew J. “Smith, contrary to tire form of the statute,” &c. The defendant moved the court to quash the indictment, which motion the court overruled. It was in proof that tlie defendant bet at a game called.rondo, played upon a billiard table. The game was also known and sometimes called by a different name. The evidence described the game particularly. It was a game on which money was…