Barde v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Writ of error to Berks county. The original suit was brought in account render to August term 1796, and bail marked in 5000I. In December 1796, common bail was ordered by the court. In April 1798, judgment quod computet, was entered, and in May following, the matters in variance between the parties, were referred by consent, generally to persons agreed upon.
Read the full summary
Writ of error to Berks county. The original suit was brought in account render to August term 1796, and bail marked in 5000I. In December 1796, common bail was ordered by the court. In April 1798, judgment quod computet, was entered, and in May following, the matters in variance between the parties, were referred by consent, generally to persons agreed upon. The referees reported, that there was due to Wilson the sum of 12,459b 1 os. 9d., of which 5380I. was to be paid according to the conditions of sale of certain lands, being the amount of the purchases made by Barde, the intestate, and the…
1Opinion of the Court
The court declared their opinion, that the different exceptions which had been taken by the plaintiffs in error, had been fully answered by the adverse counsel, and that they saw no sufficient cause to reverse the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- McMicken v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Nicholas v. WolfersbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1819
- Hays v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
- Geary v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1823